Skip to main content

Feedback Thoughts

This week, in addition to a focus on a Growth Mindset, I had the opportunity to learn more about feedback- specifically, negative feedback. Often when I have heard about feedback, it does not have a positive or a negative spin on it, rather, it is just associated with a report on how the event went. But two articles that I covered show that we often run and hide from negative feedback, resulting in a pigeonholed experience where we do not grow.

The first article is titled "How to Get Past Negativity Bias in Order to Hardwire Positive Experiences." It is an interesting take on feedback as a whole, where the author asserts that we are hardwired evolutionarily to avoid negative feedback because, often, it could result in harms to survival. The argument is that in order to get past our negativity bias, we need to take steps back and link the negative experience to positive ones, enrich the experience as a whole, and to remember them as linked events in our mind.

This is an interesting take on negative feedback because the argument is that it will always exist, and we cannot do anything about it. However, instead of trying to get over negative feedback, we can just link it with something that we have not only gotten over, but have embraced and eagerly anticipate. Linking a positive and negative experience seems to ensure that there will be a focus on the feedback aspect, and that there will be a chance to grow as well.

The second article is titled "Why It's So Hard to Hear Negative Feedback." This one is a different take, in that instead of exploring the roots of negativity bias, it explores some of the affects of negative feedback in general. The idea is that we despise negative feedback so much, that in an office setting, we will rework our entire social relationships just to avoid it. Obviously there should be a simpler way to avoid negative feedback, and their solution seems quite simple: presume good faith. Instead of waiting to get it over with, the authors urge people to go in presuming feedback is an opportunity for change and improvement. It is just a metric of what has already occurred with an eye on improving in the future.

Overall, I believe both of these to be positive ideas to combat a negative response. Both linking positivity and trusting others are basic principles that should be applied to more than just feedback, but the important thing is identifying their use in the first place, then applying them in real life.



Feedback manifests itself as good and bad, but it's end goal is improvement. Source: PixaBay

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Famous Last Words: Week before Terror

This Thursday, I was proctoring a pre-calculus test when our Complex Analysis professor announced that we would have a midterm in a week. Two days after my Thermodynamics midterm. Two days before my Fluid Dynamics Midterms. All within five days of my Numerical Analysis midterm. While this all seems super stressful, atleast once Fluid Dynamics is over, I can look forward to smooth sailing for a few weeks. This week, in contrast to the next few, is looking to be very peaceful as a whole. I got to play soccer with some friends this weekend. I had not played in a few months, but it was great to get back out on the field and run around a little. Even better, I finally decided on a Halloween costume as well- Russell from Up. The only hard thing has been finding badges. Finally, WE GOT A DOG. This part has been most exciting. She came by at some point this afternoon, a friend had brought her up. She basically explored the house for the first bit of the day, and now, she's getting more u...

Story Lab: TED Talks

This week, I completed a Story Lab, in which I watched two separate TED Talks, the links can be found here . The first talk seems to epitomize the first impressions we develop from stories, while the second one delves into the relationships we make with characters. In the first talk, the idea of a first impression is further discussed, where the speaker notes how she had opinions of a country that had been built up solely from a few stories she had been told, and how when she encountered other people, they already had predispositions based on stories they had been told. This can be broadened to a wider audience to suggest that we often see short amounts of information, and then we make the conclusions ourselves. For example, people often just read the headlines of news articles and believe they know everything about that topic afterwards, as opposed to ever reading the article. The second talk digs into the connections we make with fictional characters, and why we spend so much tim...

Week 11 Reading Notes: More Jatakas Tales Part A

This week, I continued reading more Jatakas tales. Three stories that stood out were The Woodpecker, Turtle, and Deer; The Woodpecker and the Lion, and The Red-Bud Tree. These stories can be found at More Jatakas Tales by Ellen C. Babbitt. The Woodpecker, Turtle, and Deer really stood out because it showed the selflessness of the deer. I feel like I have read many stories where once the deer was free, the turtle would be left to perish in the sack in the tree. But through teamwork, they are all able to survive. I think it's a nice tale about making sure that you always thank those that help you. In contrast, we see the lion disregard the woodpecker in The Woodpecker and the Lion. It is weird that we are suddenly getting so many stories with woodpeckers, but regardless, the lion decides that even though the woodpecker had hedged his bets well with the lion, since the lion did not eat the woodpecker, he has paid his due. This seems somewhat unfair as the lion is telling the woodp...