This week, I continue my reading of the Ramayana with part
B. While it is a continuance of part A, I did notice a few things that made it
slightly different. Namely, there is a lot of focus on dialogue, and what is
conveyed within dialogue vs. narration. Previously, I had noted that the
narration seemed to quickly gloss over large details sometimes vs. the
narration going into longer, drawn out statements like in the wedding. In the
story Rama and Bharata and Shurpanakha and Rama, there is a great effort made
into lengthy monologues about a certain virtue such as honesty and integrity
vs. a character such as Rama. These are interesting to the reader because of
the care put into stringy out such a long description.
The other interesting story is Viradha, where a monster
attacks Rama and his group. The most interesting thing about this story is that
while they try to kill him with arrows and blows, for some odd reason, they
decided to let him capture them, and put them on his shoulder, then cut off his
arms. This is confusing overall, but this only makes the monster tired, so for
some odd reason, it turns out that burying him in a pit will totally suffice.
Despite Rama and his group trying to kill this monster for the entire story,
the monster decides that after being put into a pit that he has been bested. It’s
odd that a monster that has immunity to arrows can’t jump/climb out of a pit,
but even weirder, he is admitted into heaven.
Then there is Shurpanakha and Rama, where I come to question
the logic of the Indian deities further, as the lady tries to seduce Rama by
turning into a beautiful woman and telling Rama that she is better than Sita.
This is mostly confusing because if she is the sister of a God, why would she
not just turn into another Sita, why would she not kill Sita first, or why would
she not turn herself into qualities that Rama would find attractive? Then,
after being rejected, she decides to attack Rama and be coercive, which seems
like a good plan A.
While the story’s plot and details seem cogent overall,
there is logical inconsistencies in the Ramayana that seem as though they exist
for some kind of symbolism or larger theme. It will be interesting to continue
reading, then to return to these observations and see if they still make sense.
The Demon, Marichi: Source, Wikipedia
Bibliography: Ramayana Online: Public Domain Edition compiled from M. Dutt, R. Dutt, Gould, Griffith, Hodgson, Mackenzie, Nivedita, Oman, Richardson, and Ryder.
Comments
Post a Comment